Acts 13 describes the sending forth of two men, Barnabas and Saul, for the spread of he gospel. They were called and sent forth by the Holy Spirit. Their call was revealed to certain named men in the church at Antioch. They were not called, selected, appointed, or ordained by any member of the church. They were to be separated, released from, all commitments in the church at Antioch.
The manner of this calling can hardly be a template for all further exercises in missionary endeavour. We do not believe the Holy Spirit reveals to a select company within the church, however godly, gifted, and faithful, what are His purposes for other brethren and what they are, authoritatively, to do about it.
This passage, however, is used by certain Brethren to justify what they call “Commending to the Work”. This is a practice which allows a rigid control over any who wish to serve the Lord in a full time capacity. But our Brethren go far beyond what we read in Acts 13.
So we read in Truth and Tidings,
“With Barnabas and Saul, the Spirit of God used the leadership in the commending assembly to recognize that God called these individuals (Acts 13:1-4). In a special sense, the workers commended from Antioch were accountable to that assembly to inform them about how they had fulfilled their work (14:26, 27). A report of their work to another assembly would not have that same specific focus on "fulfilling" their work. Barnabas and Saul were particularly accountable to the Antioch assembly, because through that assembly, the Lord confirmed their work. [my italics –RS]
A present-day worker may become part of an assembly the Lord has planted through his labours. In this case, he definitely should retain accountability to his commending assembly. An assembly planted through his labours may find it difficult to carry out responsibilities associated with accountability for either doctrinal error or moral misbehaviour. As devastating as such a case would be for this relatively new assembly, having to confront a father in the faith and deal with such a matter could divide and destroy this assembly. In addition, some believers might question the objectivity of the worker’s own spiritual "children."
In a different scenario, a commended worker may move to an established, mature assembly. Even in this case, the commending assembly still seems to bear some unique responsibility for commending that individual. If, for instance, the assembly to which he has moved decides that the worker needs to limit his work or that he should be removed from the work, that assembly would hardly negate his letter. That assembly’s elders would contact the commending assembly. Altering his letter would be the commending assembly’s responsibility; they signed it. [my italics-RS] The principle of Christian courtesy (1 Peter 3:8) would require that consideration! Even Paul would not make a decision in a matter that was Philemon’s responsibility (Phe 14)”—David Oliver..
It appears that the “commended worker” will carry a letter; his licence to preach, a kind of work permit which will detail the kind of work and where he is to perform it.
Here is another departure from Acts 13. We cannot believe that Paul and Barnabas carried with them a “letter of commendation”. As they were engaged in pioneer work, to whom would they have presented it?
To whom are the commending brethren accountable? They will answer, “we are accountable to the Lord”. But they will not allow this for the Lord’s servants. The commending Brethren are the elders and they answer to none but themselves.